Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's score of 90.5. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a noticeably newer device than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra comes with Android 13 operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little larger screen and a greater screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a much better video quality.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little better battery performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.