Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is extremely newer than Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it is somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a better pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a way more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.