Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than Galaxy M30s's 83.3 overall score. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version, offering lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design has the same thickness than Galaxy M30s, but it is somewhat heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a just a little higher screen density, a little bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Galaxy M30s, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a bigger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M30s counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.