Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Galaxy M31, with a general score of 95.4 against 86.5. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a heavier device than the Galaxy M31, but they have the same thickness. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy M31 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Galaxy M31 both feature extremely similar processing units, and although the Galaxy M31 has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy M31, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little greater display pixels density, way more brightness and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy M31, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera with a way higher resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy M31 has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31 has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 20% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.