Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy M31s's general score of 88. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy M31s, although it is also somewhat heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy M31s has Android 11 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Galaxy M31s, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a processing unit that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy M31s has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a much better video definition and a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy M31s counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M31s also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.