Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than vivo X60 Pro, with a 95.4 score against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer device than the vivo X60 Pro, but it is way heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, providing the user some additional features.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a bit larger display and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.