Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with a global score of 95.4 against 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much heavier phone than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but both are 0.35inches thick. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite larger screen, a much brighter screen and a little bit higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has superior battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations, a lot higher video quality, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a lot higher 108 MP resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.