Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than LG V20's overall score of 77. The Galaxy S22 design has the same thickness than the LG V20, but it's a little bit lighter. Galaxy S22 features a brighter screen than LG V20, because although it has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch of display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
LG V20 has a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 has just a little better performance than LG V20, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures way better videos and photos than LG V20, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels. Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG V20, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22, else you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.