Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is way better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with a 93.4 score against 76.4. The Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also notably thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Galaxy S22 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy S22, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy S22 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S22 counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a much better video resolution, a camera with lot more megapixels and a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.