Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a 93.4 score against 77.9. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is way newer, just a bit lighter and much thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores and also slower, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Galaxy S22 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and way lesser pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a larger aperture to take better low light images and video and a much better video definition. The Galaxy S22 has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory.
Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.