Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is much better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 score. The Galaxy S22 design is notably newer than Moto Z4's, although it is a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the display. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a higher 50 MP resolution back camera, a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a lot higher video resolution.
Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than the Moto Z4, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.