Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-08-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, having a 93.4 score against 82.1. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S22's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, but it's lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor and a lot higher resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S22 and Samsung Galaxy A8 Star both count with really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.