Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with a 93.4 score against 85.5. The Galaxy S22 is a way newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and much more display brightness. Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.