Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S23 Ultra is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 81.5 score against 81.3. Galaxy S23 Ultra is a thicker but noticeably lighter phone than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a lot more mega pixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.