Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S23 Ultra is a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, with a overall score of 81.5 against 81.2. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy S23 Ultra has a newer 13 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, giving a couple additional features. The Galaxy S23 Ultra is a somewhat thicker but lighter cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way better performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S23 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.