Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, getting a global score of 86.6 against 81.5. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit lower display pixel density and a quite smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50s, because it has a camera in the back with much more MP, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.