Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's global score of 81.5. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13 version. The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a quite smaller display, a just a little lower pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A51 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a lot larger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.