Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 500 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a general score of 81.5 against 81. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a notably lighter and thinner phone than Galaxy XCover Pro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller display, a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit less pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S23 Ultra has greater battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4050mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.