Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is much better than Galaxy S24 FE, with a global score of 87.1 against 76. The Galaxy Note9 design is a bit lighter but thicker than the Galaxy S24 FE. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note9 features a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note9 counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy S24 FE features improved battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy Note9 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.