Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-05 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is better than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored)'s 72.6 overall score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M31 has older 11 version and Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy M31 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a lot better display than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy M31 has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M31 counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy M31, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.