Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored)'s general score of 72.6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a little smaller screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more processing cores.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.