Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2019-09-20 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting an 84.9 score against 72.6. The iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with Android 15 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 5 more CPU cores and a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone 11 Pro has a much sharper display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a way better camera than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and a way better 200 mega pixels resolution back camera. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro has 3046mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.