Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| -- | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| -- | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is much better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having a score of 85 against 72.6. The Apple iPhone 8 features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a much smaller display. Apple iPhone 8 features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 8 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 3050mAh battery size instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.