Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| -- | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a score of 84.5 against 72.6. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a lot better looking display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures a lot better pictures and videos than iPhone XS Max, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos, a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a very superior memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
IPhone XS Max has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 4 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.