Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| -- | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| -- | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is much better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having an 84.7 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with Android 15 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A32 counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.