Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 global score. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a back camera with much more megapixels, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way better video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 48% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.