Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s overall score of 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 31 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.