Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-05 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 global score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy M31 has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy M31 features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much higher 200 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy M31 features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.