Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. The Galaxy Note9 features a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note9, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with way more mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.