Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| -- | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s overall score of 72.6. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a bigger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a little bit better camera than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has an 87% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.