Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s global score of 72.6. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a greater camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a much higher video resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.