Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| -- | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 general score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is thinner and notably lighter than Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel XL has a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster) and less RAM.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a way higher video quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.