Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 90.7 score against 76.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a way larger display. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 9 GB less RAM and lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Galaxy S25 Ultra has greater battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a much better video definition and a way higher 200 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.