Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and much lighter phone than the Moto G Stylus. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11, counting with lots of additional features.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a bit bigger screen, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior camera than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher resolution back camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Moto G Stylus features a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.