Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 90.7 against 77.8. These phones include the same Android 14 OS (Operating System). Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is notably thinner and noticeably lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bigger screen and a really brighter screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 14% more battery size. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes better photographs and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.7 aperture and a same size sensor, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a camera with a lot better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.