Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-02 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a better display pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra count with very similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a way better video definition, a camera in the back with a much better 200 megapixels resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has superior battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.