Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's global score of 85.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and way lighter phone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a just a little greater pixel density and a really brighter screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a camera with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 256 GB. Galaxy S25 Ultra features better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.