Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2015-11-02 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6P's global score of 80.3. Samsung Galaxy S25's construction is extremely lighter and thinner than Google Nexus 6P. The Galaxy S25 features a much better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Google Nexus 6P's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Galaxy S25 one, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a much higher video quality, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low light environments and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs more than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Nexus 6P. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.