Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 2's global score of 81.6. Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than Google Pixel 2. The Galaxy S25 counts with a better screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Google Pixel 2 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Google Pixel 2's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as Galaxy S25's one, they have equal internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way larger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.