Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| -- | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 general score. Galaxy S25 is a way lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel XL. The Google Pixel XL features a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 4 GB lesser RAM.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a better screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite inferior pixels amount per display inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Google Pixel XL features as much storage for applications and games as Galaxy S25, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a bit better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16% bigger battery size. The Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a lot better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture, a much bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos and a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.