Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| -- | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than LG V20, having a score of 82.6 against 77. The Galaxy S25 construction is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than LG V20. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than LG V20, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The LG V20 counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 less cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. LG V20 features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 has longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 25% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a much better video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.