Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a little smaller display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy S25 shoots greater photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a much better 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S25 count with quite similar battery performance.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.