Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 82.6 score against 76.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Galaxy S25 body is a lot thinner and notably lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25, because although it has less cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo and Samsung Galaxy S25 count with similar screens, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels density.
Galaxy S25 shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a bigger aperture, a way better video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. The Galaxy S25 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S25, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.