Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a noticeably lighter and way thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has older 14 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo features a display that is just as good as Galaxy S25's display, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy S25 captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way better video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and a back facing camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy S25 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.