Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-08 |
| -- | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and noticeably thinner phone than the Motorola Edge 50. These phones have the same Android 14 OS, so both of them should offer very similar operating system features.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy S25's CPU, both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit inferior pixels quantity in each display inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a way brighter display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a 0.64 inches sensor, a camera in the back with a 50 mega-pixels and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. Motorola Edge 50 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.