Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 construction is much lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11, providing the user a couple additional features.
Moto G Stylus has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy S25 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a higher resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus's battery lifetime is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S25 one.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto G Stylus, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.