Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-06 |
| -- | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features. Galaxy S25 is a noticeably thinner and much lighter device than Moto Z4.
The Galaxy S25 has a much better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little bit better count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto Z4 features a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Moto Z4 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z4 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a bit longer battery life than Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S25 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, else you can save some money and buy the Moto Z4, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.