Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| -- | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 416 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25, having an 84.7 score against 82.6. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and Galaxy S25 counts with Android 14 operating system. Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way higher pixel density.
Galaxy A32 features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A32 features better battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a better resolution back-facing camera and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.