Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-20 |
| -- | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Galaxy A60, getting an 82.6 score against 82.3. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version and Galaxy A60 has Android 11 version, providing lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S25 body is much lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy A60.
Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a little greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a way better 50 MP resolution back camera and a much better video quality.
Galaxy A60's memory for applications and games is very similar to the Galaxy S25 one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 features improved battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.