Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-27 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A8 Star, getting an 82.6 score against 82.1. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a incredibly thinner and extremely lighter phone than Galaxy A8 Star. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A8 Star has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S25 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit higher pixel quantity in each screen inch.
Galaxy A8 Star counts with a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S25 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.